Jump to content

Talk:Regeneration (Star Trek: Enterprise)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 23:43, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Easily my favorite ENT episode. —Ed!(talk) 23:43, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Archer and Reed's phase pistols are ineffective due to Borg personal shielding." -- I believe the name "Borg" was never specifically mentioned in the episode. Maybe the plot section should also do that?
  • "Archer is not comforted as he believes they've only delayed the invasion until the 24th century." -- The foreshadowing here is pretty clear, might want to add that.
  • "Filming took place between February 27, 2003 and principle photography completed on March 8." -- I assume this means filming took place from February 27 to March 8, but it isn't absolutely clear.
  • Made a copyedit for clarity to link that and the following sentence together better, as the principle photography completed on March 8, but the B shoot didn't finish until the 11th. Miyagawa (talk) 18:50, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Might be good to note that Brian Tyler scored the episode.
  • "Michelle Erica Green reviewed the episode for TrekNation, and was concerned by the continuity issues that the events in the episode presented." -- Any specific potential continuity errors mentioned?
  • Added it - she specifically stated the fact that Picard didn't have a record when he later met the Borg. After all, it would take take Data about two seconds to search the alien database for the keywords "cybernetic implants" and "assimilation". Perhaps he told the computer to exclude searches for nanite using aliens and so the Borg of the TNG series period didn't come up in the search. Darn those Access databases! Miyagawa (talk) 18:50, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Duplicate links, dab links, and external links all check out fine. I see no problems with article stability or neutrality. There are no images presented, so no licensing problems.

Placing the article on hold to wait for your responses. —Ed!(talk) 00:17, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great work! Passing the GA. —Ed!(talk) 21:36, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]