Talk:Refractive index/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 20:41, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but I'm quick-failing this article as a check reveals several whole sections that are entirely unreferenced. The article is marked as a B, but this must be highly doubtful given the lack of references. I hope you will not be discouraged by this. The article is on the face of it quite well-written and it ought to be possible to find references for it as necessary. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:41, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. All of the sections you marked have the same information in any optics textbook and in the wikipedia articles with the corresponding titles. Unfortunately I don't have access to my optics books at the moment, but I will either find som online sources or a library as soon as I have some time. Ulflund (talk) 15:59, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]