Talk:Reformed Druids of North America
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Comments
[edit]- This article does have references, so I removed the "Unreferenced" template. I changed it to a "One source" template because the content relies so heavily on ARDA.
KLuwak (talk) 00:54, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Notability and sources
[edit]A Google books search returns over 200 books. Certainly this org is notable and these books could possibly be used to source much of the content of the article so it doesn't rely so much on primary sources. Yworo (talk) 23:34, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Note on Clifton's take on Druidic sources
[edit]I added the paragraph denying Clifton's speculations. Was you there, Charlie? I was. --Howard Cherniack — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cherns Major (talk • contribs) 00:11, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Reformed Non-Aristotelian Druids of North America
[edit]I came here looking for the reformed non-aristotelian druids of North America, but there is no mention of them. In fact, I came to this page from a Google search for "reformed non-aristotelian druids of North America". I don't think they deserve their own page, but they should at least get a mention here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.69.157.77 (talk) 12:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Reformed Druids of North America/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| Should be recreated as a separate article. Badbilltucker 17:28, 24 January 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 17:28, 24 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 04:04, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Categories
[edit]A few recent edits have tried readjusting the category between Category:Pagan religious organizations and Category:Neopagan religious organizations. Frankly, I don't think either is appropriate. The article states explicitly that many members do not consider themselves neo-pagan, and many align with non-pagan religions. -- Elphion (talk) 18:56, 18 May 2017 (UTC)