Talk:Reforma

should be disambiguated at the base title

I moved the newspaper article to have a disambiguating suffix after seeing:

• all-time mass views for all topics linked from Reforma
• monthly page views for the most popular topics

There are a number of topics that actually receive larger reader interest than that one, consistently. Their long-term significance also seems at least comparable.

However, there are >400 incoming links at Special:WhatLinksHere/Reforma, so I'll go through those before completing the move. --Joy (talk) 20:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

@Joy: please, complete the moves and not create WP:MALPLACED issues. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 16:59, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

@Tbhotch did the malplaced bot already notice it? Damn, that's quick. --Joy (talk) 17:15, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

My initial run of disambiguating this indicates that the vast majority of the references to the newspaper are either clerical (links from {{cite news}} etc) or naturally disambiguated (mentioning that it's a newspaper), which reinforces the idea of not short-circuiting. --Joy (talk) 19:22, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Updated links matching those from before:

• https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/massviews/?platform=all-access&agent=user&source=wikilinks&range=latest-20&sort=views&direction=1&view=list&target=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reforma
• https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=latest-20&pages=Reforma%7CLa_Reforma%7CGrupo_Reforma%7CReforma_(disambiguation)%7CPaseo_de_la_Reforma%7CReforma_(newspaper)

--Joy (talk) 15:20, 26 October 2024 (UTC)