Talk:Redrow plc
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed revision
[edit]I am proposing a major rewrite of the History section based on published sources, including Redrow’s own history. In passing, I note that the main source currently given, the Captain Morgan article, no longer has an active link. Also, the 4 external references seem inappropriate. 1. “New Homes” is advertising 2. “Yahoo profile” is 3 years out of date 3. “corporate social responsibility seems irrelevant in the context 4. “Work for Redrow” seems mis-titled – it is the corporate web site Bebington (talk) 09:05, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- I agree that the article would benfit from expansion Dormskirk (talk) 22:54, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
Dormskirk The last line of the new history text has not come across, neither has the references or categories list - are you able to help? Bebington (talk) 13:14, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Seems to have been sorted Dormskirk (talk) 19:47, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Redrow 2015 financial results
[edit]This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Redrow plc has just announced its 2014/15 financial results, which affects the revenue, income and employee number figures currently quoted. I believe these should be: Revenue: £1,150m (2015) Operating income: £213m (2015) Net income: £162m (2015) NumberLindabrightapr (talk) 10:51, 17 September 2015 (UTC) of employees: 1,650 The up to date info can be found here: [1] [2]
Lindabrightapr (talk) 10:51, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
This request is still awaiting review/actions Lindabrightapr (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
References
Suggested amends
[edit]Please could someone update the Redrow page to include:
November 2015 Redrow retained the Gold title for Large Developer of the Year at the What House Awards [1]
Lindabrightapr (talk) 16:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
bias?
[edit]This article reads like a modified / cut and paste from a company publicity booklet
- I have removed some material which was not independently sourced. Dormskirk (talk) 00:49, 17 September 2020 (UTC)