Talk:Red River War

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Oklahoma Mid‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Old West / Military history / Texas Start‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject American Old West (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

The Red River War made the buffalo become nearly extinct!

WP:MilHist Assessment

This article has a good image, fair length, and some detail, but lacks an infobox. I also wonder if there isn't more to be said. It's just not that long of an article, and it would actually look even shorter if the image were removed. LordAmeth 11:28, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Obgectivity and information sorely needed

The article contains little military information about the actual conduct of the war, just as it glosses over numerous transgressions on the Indian side. On the other hand it is positively briming with mercilessly repetituos, demagogically ahistorical and stylistically inane propaganda against the settlers and the army. No doubt some American Indian editors of the `Eternal feud` school of `thought` - perhaps along with some non-Indian sympathisers - see it as an opportunity to vent. While some of their grievences may have historical foundation, as others surely do not, the affect of their propagandistic zeal on the article is rgrettable and destructive. As my knowledge on the period is limited to information gleaned from other internet sites I do not at this point feel able to rewrite it myself. However I urge those better versed to execute a rescue Soz101 (talk) 21:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

This article is not only totally uncited, it is also biased and rather unencyclopedic. Examples:

"Euro-Americans homesteaders, hungry for land, began to pressure the Federal Government to take military action against the Indians." As though "Euro-Americans" were a monolithic block; this is also not a common term. "Hungry for land" is inflammatory language, and the claim about pressuring the government is totally unsourced.
"But the treaty was a failure." It's one thing to say that certain groups ignored the treaty (which is true, but needs citation), but it is original research to deem the treaty a failure. At most, you can say "So-and-so historians have called the treaty a failure" if you provide sources.
"The hunters killed the animals by the thousands [...] and the U.S. government did nothing to stop them." Unsourced, and "did nothing to stop them" is condemning, POV language.
"Cattlemen [...] caused enormous environmental disruption." POV and unsourced.
"A good number of the cowboys treated all Indians as 'hostile.'" Unsourced.
"The Native Americans, with a hunting tradition that stretched back to time beyond memory..." Romantic, unencyclopedic language.
"The promises made by the U.S. government [...] proved largely empty. Food was inadequate and of poor quality." Unsourced.
"The restrictions on personal movement, trade, and worship were all but impossible for the Indians, who were used to roaming over the plains at will, to tolerate." Complete original research, totally POV, and over-romantic.

--NetherlandishYankee (talk) 14:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]