Talk:Red Museum/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 23:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Will review soon. Ruby 2010/2013 23:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

• Add wikilinks for characters in plot
• Not a fan of the image box; the images don't look good side by side, and the formatting doesn't quite fit the box template
• Identify that Carter is series creator in production section
• You repeat CBS is the network for Fences twice in the production section; you can just mention CBS the second time (and get rid of the second wikilink)
• Executive Producer -> Executive producer
• Identify Wong as a producer (or whatever his title is)
• mixed-to-negative -> mixed to negative
• Creative if convoluted -> creative if convoluted
• "Red Museum' tries..." Is the ' a typo on your part, or the authors?

✗ Not done Ruby 2010/2013 00:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

• This link doesn't go where you'd like it to (find a different url?)
• Italicize and add wikilink to Entertainment Weekly, and add date (ref 4)

✗ Not done Ruby 2010/2013 00:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

• Use consistent date formatting (9 December 2011 vs December 9, 2011 for example)
• Unitalicize Critical Myth (it's a website, not a print source)

On hold for seven days while above comments get addressed. Please respond here when you have finished. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 01:49, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

OK, I believe I've fixed everything. Tell me how it looks!--Gen. Quon (talk) 15:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Hate to be a stickler, but the above two still need fixing. Ruby 2010/2013 00:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Whoops! Sorry I missed those. OK, they're all fixed now.--Gen. Quon (talk) 04:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

No worries! As all comments have been addressed, I am passing this one for GA. Nice work, Ruby 2010/2013 05:26, 10 January 2012 (UTC)