Talk:Red Book (Liberal Party of Canada)

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I am guessing that the nickname also refers to Quotations From Chairman Mao Tse-Tung, which has the nickname "Little Red Book". Lisa Paul 03:35, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of electronic copies

The link to the electronic copies of the text go to Libscam, a website which in its home page declares that "This wiki is meant to be a repository of misdeeds, suspect behaviour, and outright scandals perpetrated by the Liberal Party of Canada." Thus, the copies presented there should be considered doctored, and not factual.

Additionally, they may be violating copyright. If copies are available online, they should only link to sites which the copyright holder has given permission to post. 164.106.241.97 15:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Do you known of any better copies online? - SimonP 15:39, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if the text is copyright, but I doubt it's been doctored in any way. I own a copy of the 1997 Red Book and though I didn't search through the PDF files word-for-word, they seem to me to be faithful scans of the original. Were you actually able to find any instances of forgery?

NPOV

Article is rather not neutral, showing a bias in favour of the Red Book and not properly offering a balanced critique. Laval (talk) 04:43, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

The front of the 1997 Red Book has this statement: "Portions of this publication may be reproduced without charge or written permission provided that appropriate acknowledgment is made of the source."

The back of the 2000 Red Book has this statement: "Portions of this document may be reproduced without charge or written permission provided that appropriate acknowledgment is made of the source." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.246.17.172 (talk) 18:26, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Red Book (Liberal Party of Canada). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.liberal.ca/english/policy/index.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.liberal.ca/english/policy/red_book/red_index.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://liberal.ca/download/plan-e.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://liberal.ca/plan/c0-02_e.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]