Talk:Red-bellied lemur
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Red-bellied lemur appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 May 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Article history re-constructed
[edit]The following is the true and substantive early history of this article, which article history was not properly transferred to the re-naming of the page:
* (cur) (last) 11:52, 27 May 2006 UtherSRG (Talk | contribs) * (cur) (last) 06:53, 27 May 2006 Covalent (Talk | contribs) (→External links) * (cur) (last) 06:13, 27 May 2006 Covalent (Talk | contribs) m (plural) * (cur) (last) 05:20, 27 May 2006 Covalent (Talk | contribs) (→Range and distribution) * (cur) (last) 03:42, 27 May 2006 Richhoncho (Talk | contribs) m (→Behaviour - disambiguation) * (cur) (last) 03:30, 27 May 2006 Keenan Pepper (Talk | contribs) m (fix taxobox) * (cur) (last) 03:15, 27 May 2006 Covalent (Talk | contribs) (Create article E. rubriventer)
One can see that until 27 May, 2006, this article was a three line stub. The substance of the article was formed under the history above, which history was effectively hidden when another user copied the bulk of the article from Red bellied Lemur
Covalent 23:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
No, that's the history for the page you created, while this article has been around since October 2005. - UtherSRG (talk) 23:39, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
But you're right... I didn't merge the histories properly. Hold on a bit and I'll do that.... - UtherSRG (talk) 23:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Ok. It's fixed. - UtherSRG (talk) 23:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you. I appreciate your restoring the lost portion of the article history reflecting the substantive expansion of the article on 27 May, 2006. Covalent 00:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)