Talk:Recording contract
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Performance Rights
[edit]I think a distinction between performing arts copyrights and recording copyrights would help to explain this critical concept. I don't know enough to make the distinction. Bmunden 21:51, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Photo of Actual Contract
[edit]Can someone put a copy of an actual contract on the page for viewers? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.150.110.135 (talk) 21:23, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
deleted
[edit]The entire "typical contract" section was filled with presented-as-unbiased-facts shots about how greedy evil record companies will always screw over the musicians and do horrible things to ruin them. I was going to go through the mess and simply delete or change the bullshit, but I realized that even if I did spend the considerable amount of time to do so, the ENTIRE massive block of text still lacks a single source or reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.22.51.202 (talk) 13:51, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Lack of citations
[edit]Most of the claims in the article are not actually supported by the citations. The citations only support the claims about Robbie Williams' and Mariah Carey's contracts, not any of the general claims. Metacell (talk) 19:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Bias
[edit]The tone of this article sounds as if it was written by a PR department of the recording industrie. There are also quite a number of weasel words in it. I've added a neutrality and weasel words tag. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.181.209.179 (talk) 16:29, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Streaming, etc
[edit]I don't see anything in the present text to deal with streaming rights, synch rights for use of recordings in film and TV, video games, etc. As these are now usually much more important than physical sales, this is a major omission. 2A00:23C8:7906:1301:3CDB:BDAD:389C:6F4B (talk) 16:19, 16 September 2020 (UTC)