Talk:Rebirth (sculpture)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 06:49, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

Well-written:

The article uses proper prose and grammar, and complies with standard structural and formatting policies. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:11, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article adheres to a fair number of reputable publications in its list of sources, and does not leave anything to "OR chance". Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:12, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article seems to have a thorough coverage of encyclopedic information on its topic. Nothing fluffy or over-detailed. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:09, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article succeeds in covering its topic in an unbiased fashion. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:08, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

No evidence in the revision history of editing wars/disputes since at least last September. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 07:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

Both images are appropriately licensed and serve valid, relevant illustrative purposes. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 07:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Thanks for offering to review this article. I look forward to addressing any concerns. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:06, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

As far as GAs go, this one has all the makings of a winner. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 08:12, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for taking time to review this article. Much appreciated! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:54, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.