Talk:Rebecca Ferdinando

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Proposed deletion of Rebecca Walsh

The article Rebecca Walsh has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Propose this be deleted on basis of WP:ENT, non-notable.

No consensus for deletion, removed offending words and added more references, way above the average on this site. gjeida — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gjeida (talk • contribs) 21:57, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notability, weasel and peacock words, verifiability

This person has only had minor roles, yet this page uses weasel and peacock words such as "appeared in roles for leading television series" "her looks and personality", "one of London's top modelling and commercial agents" etc. to imply notability.

All main sources come from the actresses own website or her starnow profile page. These are not acceptable sources, and it reads like a news release.

Googling this actress reveals headlines about her turning up at an event and being labelled as "little known actress" such as here [1]. The comments from the public here show that they do not know who she is [2]. Two cases in which she has attended premieres of films she's not even in, and the only thing she is known for is her poor attire. More so than her acting [3]. That link even says they didn't know who she was too. The only reliable news sources for this actress do not mention her acting ability or past work.

This page needs a major rewrite or a total removal as a non-notable person. 46.208.25.54 (talk) 14:45, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Added references and taken out the disputed words, some references still to find but someone in 18 films, even if 46.208.25.54 believes are minor does not constitute a deletion. Also to quote the talk section of the daily mail is mind boggling, the average daily mail reader is not a great reference! Next time 46.208.25.54, log into wiki so we know who you are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gjeida (talk • contribs) 21:56, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]