Talk:Rebbachisauridae

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge proposals for Khebbashia and Rebbachisaurinae

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was uniform support for the merges to proceed. A Cynical Idealist (talk) 05:06, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Per the discussion at WT:DINO, in an attempt to streamline the organization of higher-order clades, these merges are proposed for the following reasons:

The articles to be merged are stubs.
The articles to be merged are node-based clades with very little independent content that could be added in the foreseeable future to expand them. (WP:N)
All of the information in these two articles are relevant to discussion of rebbachisaurid classification, which is already covered by the article Rebbachisauridae. (WP:REDUNDANT)
"Rebbachisauridae" has over 450 results on google scholar vs only 11 for "Khebbashia" and 22 for "Rebbachisaurinae". In fact, a search for "Rebbachisaurinae" will return, "Did you mean 'Rebbachisauridae'?". (WP:N)
Similar sub-family-level taxa with low species counts already exist as solo articles (i.e. Pachycephalosauria, Heterodontosauridae, Megalosauridae, Alvarezsauridae, Oviraptoridae, etc.), and this merge would improve article format consistency for WP:DINO.

A Cynical Idealist (talk) 19:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per comments at WT:DINO. LittleLazyLass (Talk | Contributions) 20:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per the above. Not much sense in having them all separate in their current states. -SlvrHwk (talk) 20:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.