Talk:Reassignment method
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
The reassignment method warrants its own page, particularly when it contains this much information. However, I'd like to see more references to the early material and a description of why this method sucks (no formal description of the result of reassignment, no amplitude representation, plagued by numerical error) and why anyone would want to reassign a TFR explicitly rather than use a phase-based method of signal-component extraction (e.g. Carmona's). Fitz, can you delete all but one of your references? I don't think we need that many but if anyone then claims this is some obscure technique I'll back you up. Jon Harrop 12:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Oh, and I'd love to see a graphical example of reassignment. I do think it looks good even though I never found a use for it myself. Jon Harrop 12:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)