Talk:Realm
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Stub
[edit]What is this vocab stub tag? Does it add anything of use to this article?Grimhim 00:59, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message
[edit]This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 03:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Removed (non) Scripture
[edit]Was going to put back the supposed Jesus quote since noone responded to msg in edit summary but it appears to be non-canonical (Gospel of Judas). 72.228.177.92 (talk) 17:54, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Reich =/= Empire
[edit]In German those are two different words with distinctive meaning. The German word for empire is Imperium. --196.210.185.27 (talk) 13:30, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Depends, other than using the scholarly (Latin) word Imperium you can also translate Empire to Germany as Weltreich (as in Roman Empire or British Empire or French colonial empire, leaving out the "colonial") or as Kaiserreich (as in German Empire 1871-1918, French Empire 1804-1814/15), depending on the context. In two (established) instances, even Reich is an appropriate translation: for Roman Empire and for Holy Roman Empire. In a Star Wars context it is necessarily Imperium, of course.--2001:A61:260D:6E01:7DE3:7A3D:97F3:1BEE (talk) 18:08, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Terrible grammar, barely intelligible
[edit]And I'm not sure if this article has anything to say that Wiktionary doesn't