Talk:Real prices and ideal prices

Economics High‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

“Original research”?

The concern that this article contain “original research” might be completely allayed by sufficient use of inline citations. —SlamDiego_←T 20:11, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Theft of the article

This article was stolen by Betascript Publishing, and published under the name of authors who did not write it. [1]. User:Jurriaan 2 january 2011 17:27 (UTC)

Removal of referenced text

Bob Rayner has again cut out large parts of important referenced text for his ideological reasons, rather than genuine scientific reasons, without proper explanation or discussion. All I can say for now is, that if people are interested to read to full article, they can consult the version of 23 April 2014 in the archive annex of this article.Jurriaan (talk) 19:07, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here are two good reasons:

1. Avoid original research and synthesis. [2]

2. Don't cite a source and then directly contradict it in article content that you wrote yourself. That's a Bad Thing. [3]

There are more reasons. bobrayner (talk) 19:46, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beware of Bob Rayner's "editing"

The scam editor Bob Rayner User:Bobrayner specializes in cutting large bits out of articles that he doesn't like, for no reason at all or for some spurious reason. He doesn't understand anything about the subjectmatter. The article then has to be reset to what is was before his vandalism. This article is still being worked on from time to time and Rayner's destructive habits are unwanted here. Jurriaan (talk) 19:23, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]