Talk:Read-Only Memory (publisher)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cognissonance (talk · contribs) 19:44, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Drunk right meow. Will start when I'm sober fam. ~(^з^)- Cognissonance (talk) 19:44, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

History and publications

• "The 30-year anniversary" – Clarify: "The 30th anniversary".
• Ref. 6 covers the launch of the Sensible Software Kickstarter campaign only. Ref. 3 contains the publishing date. I suggest putting Ref. 6 together with Ref. 3.
• Contributors not included in the last sentence of the second paragraph are Mike Montgomery, Gary Bracey and Peter Molyneux.
• "Still, the book did not appear to be one-sided" – Improve prose: "Despite this, the book was not considered to be one-sided".

Sega Mega Drive/Genesis: Collected Works

• "Read-Only Memory released its next art book, Sega Mega Drive/Genesis: Collected Works, covering the development, life, and legacy of Sega's 16-bit console, in late 2014" – Improve flow: "Read-Only Memory released its next art book, Sega Mega Drive/Genesis: Collected Works, in late 2014—covering the development, life, and legacy of Sega's 16-bit console."
• "over 30 interviews" – Ref. 14 says there were "almost 30 interviews".
• Omitted interview subjects include Peter Morawiec, Rich Karpp and Michael Latham.

Overall

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall: On hold.

   Pass/Fail:

   @Czar: Cognissonance (talk) 10:01, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks for the review, @Cognissonance! I've addressed your points, if you'll take a look. I didn't add the additional names because the article isn't meant to be a full accounting of interviewees, but summarize the highlights (particularly the notable interviewees, who have their own articles). czar 07:06, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Good point. Cognissonance (talk) 08:30, 5 May 2017 (UTC)