Talk:Reactions to the Panama Papers

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Reactions to the Panama Papers article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism High‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Panama (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Panama, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PanamaWikipedia:WikiProject PanamaTemplate:WikiProject PanamaPanama articles

Icons

The flag and other icons are overkill, in my opinion. (I think there's a guideline on them somewhere.) The article would be better off without them. czar 02:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest renaming

I suggest to rename this page to Investigations of Panama Papers if anyone is going to split the content, because the actual content from the corresponding sections in Panama papers is about claims and investigations, not about international reactions. My very best wishes (talk) 02:43, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These pages usually start out as "International reactions to X", or in this case, be governmental in scope (and connected to investigations), but the scope of this article really extends to all of the fallout from the Panama Papers so that the corresponding section in the original article can be better summarized. czar 11:11, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I am just looking how paragraphs begin: "On April 7, 2016, federal prosecutor Federico Delgado began a formal investigation into [president] Macri's involvement" "Many senior EU figures have been implicated in the Panama Papers scandal", "The Süddeutsche Zeitung, which made the papers public, has described the connections of various individuals listed in the papers to Russian President Vladimir Putin." and so on. This is not about international reactions, but about international investigations, scandals, international corruption, etc. Quite possibly the content could be split, but one should rename this page and I am not sure how exactly. My very best wishes (talk) 01:28, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

article format

first, why is there hidden m/d/y and American English tags in the article? I don't see any reason for them, especially considering that the leaks did not occur in the US and the brunt of the backlash was arguably in Europe.

second, could this article be segmented into continents, rather than having a very long list of individual countries in alphabetical order?

third, I propose most or all of the content from Panama Papers#Allegations, reactions, and investigations being moved here, as the article has a length problem and this article seems to have mostly the same content. I have also brought this up on the Talk:Panama Papers page. Ashela (talk) 19:47, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]