Jump to content

Talk:Reactions to Jersey Shore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Controversy

[edit]

To be a controversy a reliable third party source actually has to refer to this as being a problem with the store. Something being reported as fact with no opinion given, doesn't make it a controversy. For example the Beachcomber's bar incident doesn't see to have any third party sources complaining about it. it's simply reported as fact as what happened. There is no controversy. Editors adding such sections to the article which aren't properly sourced as controversies would be violating WP:NPOV and WP:OR. If there are sources that refer to any unreferenced incidents in a controversial way please add them. I'll run through and clean up this article after a few days. Something negative happening doesn't automatically making it a controversy.--Crossmr (talk) 06:08, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Third parties are complaining about this, There are a number of complaints by various people and organizations about the show in this article, due to reasons such as racial sterotyping by the show and Snooki's promotion of tanning beds.-Zyrath 03:49, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Is it true?

[edit]

I've heard none of the slime on the show are even from NJ.

If so it's worth mentioning —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.142.242.108 (talk) 03:33, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They aren't, but that is a public fact and no one is complaining, so it does not need to be mentioned.-Zyrath 03:49, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Controversy and criticism of Jersey Shore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:25, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Controversy and criticism of Jersey Shore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Controversy and criticism of Jersey Shore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:43, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Reactions_to_Jersey_Shore&oldid=1209982621"