Talk:Rayovac

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles

Brands

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles

Spectrum Brands

As Spectrum Brands is a diversified company making a lot more than batteries, it deserves its own article. I can try to make one when I get around to it, but if others wish to start an article, go ahead.Steelbeard1 (talk) 11:47, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I created the article under Spectrum Brands. Feel free to add to it. Steelbeard1 (talk) 18:51, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rayovac should have its own article as it is now owned by energizer Wonderabouter12 (talk) 06:31, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hybrid Batteries Section

I don't understand why this article veers off into a tangent about hybrid batteries. Since this section has nothing to do with the topic of the article (namely, the Rayovac brand), I think this section should be moved to its own article. As it is, the section is unsourced and seems to consist of original research. --Nonstopdrivel (talk) 02:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article could certainly be much improved, but I think this section should be kept.-69.87.199.178 (talk) 01:32, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rayovac Commercials

Do any of you remember those Rayovac commercials from the Ninties featuring Micheal Jordan and those CG Battery eating devices? I remember them vagely as I remember seeing the one with the cd player on The Rhythm and Hues website before they took it down. Philipnova798 (talk) 21:31, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]