Talk:Raymond Henry Norweb

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Raymond Henry Norweb article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The CorenSearchBot has performed a web search

I think that in this cass CorenSearchBot's web search does not have a point. The text from the NY Times article and Wikipedia are quite different. Since I was the one writing the article I will not be removing the tag, but could someone please do it? J Pratas (talk) 16:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

J Pratas, there are a few duplicated sentences but the article has quite more content than the referenced page. Anyway I ask you to check the report and rephrase those sentences, to stay on the safe side, and then feel free to remove the tag yourself. - Nabla (talk) 01:35, 26 November 2015 (UTC) for the record, I also commented on this at JPratas' talk page[reply]

I don't think there are any copyright concerns here. The phrases that the source and article have in common are generic sentences about positions or institutions that would be difficult to rephrase, and it's entirely possible that the text wasn't taken from there at all. There are only so many ways you can say that someone graduated from Harvard in 1916. Hut 8.5 22:37, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]