Talk:Ray Everett
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
NPOV tag
[edit]The NPOV tag has been up for 6 months, but the complainer hasn't done any of the things recommended in the NPOV dispute process:
From the NPOV dispute page:
- If you come across an article whose content does not seem to be consistent with Wikipedia's NPOV policy, use one of the tags below to mark the article's main page. [DONE]
- Then, on the article's talk page, make a new section entitled "NPOV dispute [- followed by a section's name if you're challenging just a particular section of the article and not the article as a whole]". [NOT DONE]
- Then, under this new section, clearly and exactly explain which part of the article does not seem to have a NPOV and why. [NOT DONE]
- Make some suggestions as to how one can improve the article. [NOT DONE]
- Be active and bold in improving the article. [NOT DONE]
Six months have passed and the complainer hasn't done those things. As the NPOV dispute page says:
"Everyone can agree that marking an article as having an NPOV dispute is a temporary measure, and should be followed up by actual contributions to the article in order to put it in such a state that people agree that it is neutral." [...] "repeatedly adding the tag is not to be used as a means of bypassing consensus or dispute resolution. If your sole contribution to an article is to repeatedly add or remove the tag, chances are high that you are abusing your "right" to use the tag."
Based on the above, I'm removing the tag. If anyone wants to replace the tag, that's fine, but as the guidelines suggest, you should be prepared to actually do something constructive, not just abusive 'drive-by' tagging.
Thanks! 71.2O2.86.94 (talk) 23:02, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Ray Everett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051117020551/http://archives.cnn.com:80/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/04/03/clinton.trade/index.html to http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/04/03/clinton.trade/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:54, 19 February 2016 (UTC)