Talk:Rawla Mandi

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Rajasthan / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rajasthan (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

I want to write more and more in wikipedia articles like Rawla Mandi.Plz wikipedian help me how to edit is sections of contents for exmple:adding new section into contents etc.Shemaroo (talk) 12:18, 24 September 2010 (UTC) Rawla mandi : there is a village rawla at distance of 4 k.m from rawala mandi . the village have govt. secondry school so the all the pass out from this school addmit in the rawla mandi school .there is time of the school in summers 8;30 o 1;30 and in the winters 10;30 to 4;30..!!..to be continue...!! AMIT JAYANT..!(8003513055) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.5.158 (talk) 18:53, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editing by Bhoomikpra

Bhoomikpra had added false fact regarding in history section of the article.He had added 30 AS is a major chak of Rawla mandi.It is totally false because 3 AS is not part of Rawla mandi.Other question raised by above user that Indian wrestling and badminton is not played in Rawla Mandi.This user should get information about wrestler family of Ranjhe Khan and wrestling tournaments in Rawla.Badmindon is popular among students. Shemaroo (talk) 10:51, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

== Consideration to delete Infobox used in Article ==  I can not understand why this infobox has been kept under consideration to delete.Facts and informations shown in the infobox is 100% accurate and i have hardworked in arrangin that infobox. Please mention adequate reasons before deletion so that i can make needed changes .I am surprised with mentioned tags.
Shemaroo (talk) 10:48, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge section "According to Census 2001" into "Demographics"

This section does have data but does not qualify for a separate section of itself. An appropriate place would be within under the "Demographics" section. Srihari Thalla (talk) 17:12, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]