Talk:Rashidun army

Military history: Early Muslim Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600)

Islam: Muslim history Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Muslim history task force.

Arab world Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Egypt Low‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yemen Low‑importance

	Yemen portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Yemen, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yemen on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YemenWikipedia:WikiProject YemenTemplate:WikiProject YemenYemen articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge with Rashidun Army

I support the merge of these two articles. Wandalstouring 11:26, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey merge it imediately !!!!1 i when created the article "Rashidun army" i just moved it to "Rashidun Caliphate army", thinking that when some one will write "Rashidun army" or Rashidun Caliphate army" the same article will be opened ! but i shocked when i saw it have became a totally different article..... plz merge it, i dont know how to merge !

Mohammad Adil 20:24, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

This is an excellent article, but requires some rebalancing to bring it up to the standards of similar articles Military of ancient Rome, United States Armed Forces or Byzantine army. The current article reads extols the army in every way (tactics, strategy, organization and conduct) and reads like an advertisement.

Remarkably little critical analysis of conduct, given that the army was responsible for imperial conquests.
Lack of listing of major actions
Evolution to the post-Rashidun period
Role in the political system — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.178.108.5 (talk) 08:44, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of Sources in the Strategy and Bows section...

"Another remarkable strategy developed by Khalid and later followed by others generals"

I changed that. This strategy was not thought by Khalid. It was a strategy which was developed by Al-Muthanna ibn Haritha during his conquest of Persia.

"During the conquest of Persia, Arab archers were noted to be using very heavy arrows, referred to as "bolts" by Persian witnesses, that possessed exceptional armour piercing capability at short range. One Persian chronicler wrote that while the light arrow shot by Persian archers would often be stopped by the Arab padded clothing, the Arabs' own bolts would tear through their opponent's hauberks and "double cuirasses"."

What is this? Where is the source on this claim. I've read many battles fought between Rashidun army and Persian Sassanid army and most Muslim chroniclers described that Persian arrows were much more lethal than Arabian arrows. Though it was possible that Rashidun army might have modified their arrows into better armor-piercing version to counter the Persian arrows, I would like some source on that. 113.210.7.181 (talk) 00:18, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is the motto a joke?

What is the source for the motto? (the motto says "God, the nation, the revolution, the unity")

The words "the nation" (Al Watan) and "the thawra" (the revolution) are clear anachronisms, so please reconsider this bit.

78.250.7.155 (talk) 04:36, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the literature list??

The citations in "references" are not up to scientific standard.

Training?

How did they train their soldiers and leaders? was it formal or informal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.3.189.45 (talk) 11:33, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Frolmal... i just added Ahendra (talk) 05:24, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

scorched earth

rashidun caliphate used to destroy the food and nutrition sources of their opponents, particularly at cities in the Greater Middle East that were part of the "Ancient World", (pre-islamic cities). 43.242.178.200 (talk) 14:46, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]