Talk:Raashii Khanna

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

image

Sir what i can add image in this page? Naman mishra 11:00, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

rashi khanna height

Her height is not correct on Wikipedia her real height is 1.62m i think recently someone changed her height Afzalkhan7197 (talk) 10:29, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The height cannot be incorrect as there is no height listed. Also, even if reliably sourced, we don't include the height of celebrities unless it is particularly notable (see Template:Infobox person.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:40, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 May 2018

This edit request to Raashi Khanna has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

49.14.99.162 (talk) 18:05, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. NiciVampireHeart 20:27, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 12 September 2018

This edit request to Raashi Khanna has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Raashi Khanna is not married, so remove the spouse field from the info provided in the panel box. Srava4a (talk) 02:48, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 09:22, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 12 September 2018

This edit request to Raashi Khanna has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Spouse = Naman Mishra (m.2017) remove this field; she is not married.Hence remove the following. Srava4a (talk) 02:51, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 09:22, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New additions

@Gautham offl: Tell me the timestamp in the video where she says she graduated from Lady Shree Ram college with a BA degree. The video is already in a non-English language. Without proper timestamp, it can get removed as per WP:BLPPRIVACY. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:20, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are no interviews from Raashi Khanna in english. But see the interview cited as 4 she mentions lady shri ram college as LSR. Gautham offl (talk) 07:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In the video cited as number5 you will know about her graduation (english hons.) at timestamp 05:30 onwards Gautham offl (talk) 07:40, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gautham offl: Thanks, I've added timestamp with a quote for her honours degreee. Can you tell me teh timestamp where she says Lady Sree Ram college here? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure i'll search for it and let you know it by tomorrow

Gautham offl (talk) 10:44, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Timestamp for lady shriram college (lsr) in video cited as number4 from timestamp 16:05 to 16:13 Gautham offl (talk) 11:05, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gautham offl: Thanks a bunch. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:13, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus for Awards and Recognitions

Which awards do we have a consensus for to add to the article? (@Sathish Kathiravan and @Gautham offl Please stop edit warring and rather reach a consensus first.) -- DaxServer (talk) 08:21, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Film awards and recognitions should generally have their own articles for inclusion per WP:FILMCRITICLIST. -- Ab207 (talk) 09:14, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually those two awards added by Sathish Kathiravan are honours awarded by colleges- College of Guindy(Techofes) and Vydehi group of Institutions(Mahila Ratna)

Can we add those awards awarded by any college institution? If yes, then please include those two.. Gautham offl (talk) 13:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think they should be included. Anyone can set up an award and give it to celebrities for publicity. We are not obligated to to record every single one of them. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:01, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reversions by Gautham offl

Gautham offl, these reverts make no sense. If people have to scroll down to find out about her, then why do articles have a lead in the first place? Secondly, she is introduced as an "actress" in the opening line, so why is she suddenly an "actor" later? Thirdly, streaming shows/web shows are television. And that's not even including the grammatical errors that you are restoring! Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:12, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look I am not here to argue with you. Even I seek for an amicable bond with all the wikipedia editors here. Whatever I do, I also state the reason behind my act. And I believe thats the reason wikipedia provides a text box so that editors can state the reasons for their edit. So there is no point in deeming the reverts/edits that I make as "doesn't make any sense". I have a reason for my edit and I stated it. If you feel that I might be wrong, try to give a valid reason as to why I am wrong in that case in your edits. I agree with your justification for your second edit. I shall agree to your third edit to some extent, unless the English philosopher in you could explain the gramatic errors that you saw and you corrected. Definitely I didn't add the line having "Shaitan Ka Bachcha".

Again, I'll reiterate the fact that whatever the edit I make, I shall specify them at the text box that wikipedia provides while submitting the edits. So, there isn't anything called as "senseless" if someone states a reason for his/her act. Thank you. Gautham offl (talk) 13:43, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. The fact that you say "gramatic errors" is all that the "English philosopher" in me will point out. Also, understand that Wikipedia is based on a community in which we discuss and collaborate with each other, and if you think doing so is "arguing", then this might not be the right place for you. Thank you to you too. ;) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:49, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Still I didn't get the reason for the grammatical error that you found in Shaitan Ka Bachcha statement prior to your correction. You seem to be much focussed in correcting the errors in these chats that I make with you. I can't keep focussing on each and every word in this free wheeling conversation like how I edit for any wikipedia page. You would have ignored my message if you didn't understand the context of my text. I am open to discuss with editors and sharing knowledge. But it is the tone of your text that makes me feel that you are "arguing" in a way that easily "puts off" the reader. I hope you would obviously know that an argument is an opinion with reason amd I seek for that reason from your recent edits. Please don't check for errors in my chat with you again. I got some answers to some of my reverts that I shouldn't have done and I seek for some more reason for some other reverts that I did and that you have reverted them back to your initial edits (For example that Shaitan Ka Bachcha as I mentioned before). Thank you. Gautham offl (talk) 14:15, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable sources

International Business Times is unreliable. Please see WP:IBTIMES. It is Wikipedia policy (Wikipedia:Verifiability) that all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. If a claim is only attributable to an unreliable source, then there is no justification for including that claim in an article at all. Geniac (talk) 02:54, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]