Talk:Rare earths trade dispute

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Trade

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Manhattanville College/International Trade (Spring 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Is this really a thing that is capitalized as a proper noun?

This article should, if it exists at all, be "Rare earths trade dispute" unless someone can point to a WP:RS that refers to it as a discrete thing that is thus appropriately capitalized as a proper noun. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:01, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can the original writer or anybody to rephrase "Critics pointed at this incident to argue that China was not above using its dominance in rare earths production to gain leverage in international negotiations."?

I'm now translateing this article [Rare earths trade dispute] into traditional Chinese. I think I know the wordings' meaning, but the wordings themself seem not to be right. Can anybody help make them more plainer and clrearer? Thanks.ThomasYehYeh (talk) 04:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article was almost certainly written by a teenager who is very passionate about history, but this type of register isn't suited for wikipedia

Referring to countries as persons "China argued x" makes the article appear very immature. Countries are not people with personalities, and they're portrayal as such is associated comedic media. An informational article should avoid characterizing entire nations as if the conflict at hand was an episode of Seinfeld between world leaders. Oro Temp (talk) 23:11, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]