Jump to content

Talk:Ranthambore National Park

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I've created a brief guide which people can expand. I'm particulalry happy with the external links I've added. Much better than the rubbish that litters the Internet and always seems to get high placing on search engines.

I haven't dared to say anything about tiger numbers. If you think you know how many tigers there are in Ranthambore please add a section and fully cite your sources. Also anything on poaching and human encroachment.

Feel free to leave any comments here.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.66.197 (talkcontribs) 13 June 2005‎

I'm going to add a lot to this

[edit]

When I have the time I'll work on this. There are tigers living in Ranthambhore. I'm not sure exactly how many, but in the 1990's, there were about 30-45.Thylacine lover 03:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added some but I'm not done yet. I did get some information about Ranthambore tigers.Thylacine lover 03:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC) I have been there twice and took four tours; two in the morning and two in the afternoon. Sighted no tigers.But any VIP or anyone who goes there with a message conveyed to the forest/district authorities always sights tigers. If they are not able to sight tiger in the normal tours, they are taken to not-open-to-public-places where tigers are present by the forest officials who have the ways/means to locate their presence on a real time basis. Thus, this place also suffers from the typical VIP syndrome where real and genuine tourists who bring so much of income are short-changed. They are charged exorbitant amounts for the jeeps by monopolistic forest department. So tourists, beware! If you want to sight tigers, find a contact in the right government quarters and you will not be disappointed even if that requires violating rules to take you even to the prohibited areas. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrrajksingh (talkcontribs) 04:13, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition

[edit]

I believe there are now 23 tigers at Ranthambore National Park. I was there on January 7,8th. The park is also poorly managed as you have to book at least several months in advance with Rajasthan Wildlife authorities, and you are upon arrival assigned a zone to which you are restricted to during your entry to the park. The Park I believe has been divided into 6 zones, so if a tiger is spotted in zone 4 and you are in zone 3 you cannot cross over into zone 4.Jayachans (talk) 06:48, 30 January 2011 (UTC) Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 09:12, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ranthambore National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:39, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ranthambore Foundation

[edit]

Anyone know anything about the Ranthambore Foundation? - for a new section perhaps? 2A04:B2C2:805:5600:DD7D:4548:F689:30BE (talk) 00:48, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]