Talk:Rangers F.C. signing policy/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  15:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "Prior to the First World War, Rangers did not have any policy regarding religion dictating if they could be signed or not. Prior to the war" - repetition of "prior to the"

   The lead should be expanded more to summarise the article

   "While he denied the existence of the signing policy, he stated that "no religious barriers will be put up at this club" - replace with "said" to avoid repetition

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   No original research found.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I don't see any reason to put this on hold, so I'll pass it now. The lead should be expanded somewhat though JAGUAR  19:13, 30 October 2016 (UTC)