Talk:Ranga P. Dias

This article was nominated for deletion on June 29, 2021. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Recent edits

Just a quick note to say that this page is filling up with unsupported and partisan comments "Dias says..." etc. Due a clean up? PinOats (talk) 20:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And e.g. "Dias has developed a new method to detect the superior test of superconductivity."

That's meaningless... PinOats (talk) 20:33, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PinOats, I agree, significant sentiment is leaking into the article. Xirtam Esrevni (talk) 08:11, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Is this possible: "In 2022, James Hamlin, a physicist at the University of Florida, alleged that Dias may have copied data in a 2021 paper from an experiment on a different material in his 2013 Ph.D. thesis"?

Date of Ph.D. thesis: 2013

Date of new paper: 2021

Regards,

Animée — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:9E8:BE80:4000:3173:1441:9951:FBCF (talk) 09:33, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very detailed story about the recent scandals

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00716-2 Written by the Nature News team, which is editorially independent of Nature. McKay (talk) 03:12, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking about how to add all that into the article. Firestar464 (talk) 13:12, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]