Talk:Randy Lennox
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 21 November 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was nom withdrawn. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
File nominated for deletion on commons
[edit]file:c:File:Randy Lennox and the Launch.jpg Reason:No permission indicated subpage:
Message automatically deposited by a robot on 08:57, 2 January 2018 (UTC). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harideepan (talk • contribs)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:36, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
coi
[edit]because BBiz2257 (talk · contribs) insists I will spell out why the coi tag was placed by someone many moons ago.
- the following IPs have made zero edits outside this page, and their edits seem to be PR-related:
- 64.229.18.146 (talk · contribs)
- 74.12.179.86 (talk · contribs)
- 199.167.157.95 (talk · contribs)
- 74.14.80.173 (talk · contribs)
- 147.194.38.198 (talk · contribs)
I haven't even reached 2019 yet. from a preliminary reading of this article i can see many sections that can be straight deleted. i leave that to an editor less involved. i will keep this page on my watchlist as i suspect many more IPs and new accounts will be making similar changes in the future. Good day—RetroCosmos talk 16:46, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- @RetroCosmos I saw your note on my talk page and read through the conflict of interest documentation. I do not believe it applies to me, but given that I've made only a handful of edits total I can see why you might think that.
- I looked at those edits/IPs and agree with you that whoever made them was pretty clearly biased. The bias was only part of why I thought it was appropriate to delete them, they were also unsourced and had weird formatting. I'm confused, was that not the right thing to do? If this was a misstep, I welcome clarification.
- I also agree that a lot of the article could be pared back substantially, probably by 30-50%. Particularly 'Career' & 'Documentaries & Productions.' I would be happy to take a first cut at editing those sections for clarity and conciseness, but it's not clear whether or not that would welcomed.
- Please let me know the appropriate way to constructively respond. -BBiz2257 (talk) 17:46, 12 March 2024 (UTC)