Talk:Randall–Sundrum model

Text and/or other creative content from 5 dimensional warped geometry theory was copied or moved into Randall–Sundrum model with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Merge from 5 dimensional warped geometery theory

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like 5 dimensional warped geometery theory is an effort to describe the Randall-Sundrum model from a non-technical point of view. As such, it probably has some material that would be useful to merge into this article. -- SCZenz (talk) 10:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very true. Stupidly, I wrote the article before making a thorough check for it. Now that I have found the Randal-Sundrum models article, I say that merging is a good idea. Mixen Dixon (talk) 20:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC) Agree This page should be merged. Kivar2 (talk) 01:27, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree You also created the article with a misspelling in the article name. I brought it up on the article's talk page and an admin moved the article to the correctly spelled name. Dr. Morbius (talk) 04:53, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree Clearly both articles describe the same model. (TimothyRias (talk) 08:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Naive question on practical consequences

Ok, as soon as "warp factor" was mentioned, this question became inevitable. What "glues" us to the Tevbrane, and is this in any sense negotiable? Scottwh (talk) 14:13, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

Why are there three references to work by Gogberashvili, but none by Randall and/or Sundrum? It almost seems as though someone wants to make an argument for priority for Gogberashvili against Randall and Sundrum and is using the Wikipedia article to do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.83.90.66 (talk) 18:33, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gogberashvili edited thts to push his stuff from arxiv.i Verdana♥Bold 19:03, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]