Talk:Ralph Nader/GA1

GA Review

Unsuccessful. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:59, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Trainsandotherthings (talk · contribs) 03:09, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there @Thriley: I am willing to review this article, however I am not going to do a full review until the multiple uncited paragraphs are properly cited. I think there's enough meat here that I am not quickfailing, but if these missing citations are not addressed in 7 days' time, I will be failing unless the nominator commits to working on them but asks for a bit more time (1996, 2000, 2004 campaigns, periodicals, and television all have uncited paragraphs or parts of paragraphs, and two citation needed tags remain present in the article). Trainsandotherthings (talk) 03:09, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I’ll be working on the article over the coming week. Best, Thriley (talk) 04:50, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It has been nine days without improvement. I'm willing to give you until the end of the weekend, and at that point I will have to fail if the missing citations have not been resolved. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:04, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Working on it right now. Sorry for the delay! Thriley (talk) 21:34, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It has been close to a month and I still count 7 citation needed templates. Regretfully it is time to fail this nomination. It can be re-nominated once the missing citations have been fully addressed. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:59, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.