Talk:Rakshasa (amatya)

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 21 September 2020 by reviewer Kvng (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kathyayana

@PPCMD: Please provide a decent source for the claim that Rakshasa was a historical person, or that his birth/real name was Kathyayana. Have a look at WP:RS (and WP:HISTRS in particular for history-related articles). The sources that you've added are not WP:RS-compliant. E.g.

Chanakya Kautilya: Understanding the Colossal Genius is self-published (the author is founder of the publishing company), and the author is not a historian or qualified academic. Moreover, the book borrows information from Wikipedia (for example, see page 8), and is not acceptable per WP:CIRCULAR
Chanakya and the Art of War is authored by a 'management thinker', not a historian or qualified academic
Mahamatya Chankaya (Ashwini Parashar) and Chanakya (B. K. Chaturvedi) are not scholarly works either, and Diamond Pocket Books is not a great publisher

Another source cited by you - Hinduism and the Ethics of Warfare in South Asia (p. 62) - explicitly calls Mudrarakshasa a fictional political drama: being based on historical events doesn't make it historically accurate.

Also, please don't delete 'a' at the end of Sanskrit names, as you did here. Have a look at Schwa deletion in Indo-Aryan languages. utcursch | talk 20:59, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]