Talk:Rakahanga-Manihiki language

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Polynesia: Cook Islands Low‑importance

	Oceania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polynesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Polynesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolynesiaWikipedia:WikiProject PolynesiaTemplate:WikiProject PolynesiaPolynesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Cook Islands (assessed as Mid-importance).

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Noahbrowne4. Peer reviewers: Dekash1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

untitled

Bibliography

http://www.language-archives.org/item/oai:pacific.library.manoa.hawaii.edu:833158

https://joshuaproject.net/people_groups/14515/NZ

https://wikivisually.com/wiki/Rakahanga-Manihiki_language

https://glottolog.org/resource/languoid/id/raka1237

These links are sites that are related to the language but not yet cited with information in the article. Noahbrowne4 (talk) 01:26, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review for Ling 102

The article is neutral and shows different aspects of this language. Each of the sources is from a reliable text. Most of the sections use the same authors within the section. The information of the language was written well. The main change I would suggest is that you look over some of your sentences, where your grammar gets a bit unclear. The most important improvement for this article is to clarify the language section, it was a little confusing to read. However, I did gain some insight as to how I can structure my own article, so it was a big help. Dekash1 (talk) 23:41, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the great feedback about my article. I will make the changes to improve my article with putting together a well structured language section with clear grammar where it is easier for the reader to read. I will also input myself, images to give the reader a more visual look of the two islands and the language. Your feedback is greatly appreciated and will be used to improve my article. (Noahbrowne4 (talk) 18:15, 5 October 2018 (UTC))[reply]

English.

The English grammar of this article needs fixing by a properly bilingual speaker. The following pair of consecutive sentences are just fragments.

When using H instead of S and WH instead of H. What happens when using these?

In Tahitian, in retaining K and NG and using WH and a more sounded H. In retaining these sounds, what results?

I strongly encourage the writer of this article to get assistance from a competent user of English in revising it. You have something useful to tell us, but it needs to be told in a way we can properly understand. Kia kaha! Koro Neil (talk) 09:59, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable source

The source for the number of speakers can't be relied upon, as it is from 1932. Please see https://endangeredlanguages.com/lang/5338 instead, which cites the far more recent 2016 edition of Ethnologue. 135.135.60.124 (talk) 01:36, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]