Talk:Rajini Rao
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Notability.
[edit]One criterion is about whether The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources. In fact, 1.a) talks about if the academic has been an author of highly cited academic work.
Well, you can check on Google Scholar that Rajini Rao has an h-index of 48. This, in the field of Biology.
If you take a look at this study by Anna Samoilenko & Taha Yasseri,The distorted mirror of Wikipedia: a quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics, back when it was published only 36% of Biologists (academics) with an article in WP:EN had an h-index over the mean of their field that, at the moment, was 22. So, well, I'm quite sure in 7 it has not doubled, and even so professor Rajini Rao would be over the mean and deserve to hare an article.
So, I hope the «notability thingy» will not be put there again. Thanks.
--77.75.179.1 (talk) 00:33, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Agree, Rao is more than notable enough to fulfil these notability criteria. To the editor who corrected the tag User:77.75.179.1: thank you! If you make a Wikipedia account it will let you easily track all of your contributions as well as telling other editors you're serious about contributing to the encyclopaedia. Please make one if you can! Jesswade88 (talk) 06:16, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Women scientists articles
- Unknown-importance Women scientists articles
- WikiProject Women scientists articles
- WikiProject Women in Red articles not associated with a meetup
- All WikiProject Women in Red pages
- C-Class Autism articles
- Unknown-importance Autism articles
- WikiProject Autism articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press