Talk:Rajbhar

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in April 2015.

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in to an extended confirmed account (granted automatically to accounts with 500 edits and an age of 30 days)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Information

Please give only correct information about the rajbhar King suraj (talk) 12:06, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

caste pov and promotion

none of the source states that They belongs to Naagvanshi Kshatriya.The Bhar Or Bharshiva-Kshatriya Runngummer (talk) 22:57, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

H.R., Nevill, (1921). Bahraich : a gazetteer. Superintendent Government Press is 1921 gazette publication, also it does not state anything about rajbhar

as mentioned here, also not a reliable source as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

Please revert to earlier version — Preceding unsigned comment added by Runngummer (talk • contribs) 18:48, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Bhar and Rajbhar is the same Caste. The other gadgeteer says that Rajbhar and Bhar are same so Is bhar are naagvanshi then rajbhar are also naagvanshi and Other sources which i gave was written in maithili language please read those sources rather than Reverting my articles

Raj r n singh (talk) 07:12, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And the 4 sources which i have given are also proven and in many proven books Raj r n singh (talk) 07:16, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The links provided are not valid

IX - CITY OF WICHITA INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS (IRBS) – SPECIFICITY is totally unrelated to this article.

Another link points to dictionary of artists

one is not in english

and then one book does not mention what is being added

please please read Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia and provide book references

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources Runngummer (talk) 18:10, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 December 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Rajbhar belongs to Ancient Bhar clan SpidyKrishna (talk) 01:03, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please change 'the Rajbhar are traditionally labourer' to ' Rajbhar are the descendants of ancient Bhar clan' which mentioned in many gazetteer of Uttar Pradesh's district SpidyKrishna (talk) 01:08, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:33, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]