Talk:Rajarhat New Town Assembly constituency

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

India: West Bengal / Politics Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move 9 May 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rajarhat New Town → Rajarhat New Town (Vidhan Sabha constituency) – Move the page to Rajarhat New Town (Vidhan Sabha constituency) as per WP:NC and WP:CONSISTENT. Manasbose (talk) 16:21, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support As per WP:CONSISTENT. ~Amkgp (✉) 18:51, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Tentative oppose This appears to be unnecessary disambiguation, unless there is some other topic with the name "Rajarhat New Town". I am also not convicned by the consistency argument, as a quick glance at Category:Assembly constituencies of West Bengal suggests that West Bengal constituencies do not necessarily have "(Vidhan Sabha constituency)" appended to the name where it is not necessary (over 40 constituency articles are not disambiguated). Number 5 7 10:35, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The local people refer New Town, Kolkata as Rajarhat New Town. When you say Rajarhat New Town it generally refers to New Town, Kolkata and not to the Vidhan Sabha. Even the West Bengal Tourism ministry uses the name Rajarhat New Town for disambiguation. Hence move the page to Rajarhat New Town (Vidhan Sabha constituency) and convert the page Rajarhat New Town into a disambiguation page. Manasbose (talk) 07:28, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The local people refer New Town, Kolkata as Rajarhat New Town... That can/should be handled by a hat-note, not article renaming or creation of a disambiguation page. Abecedare (talk) 19:02, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I think this is a WP:TWODABS case, which can be handled via a hatnote. Generally you only need DAB pages if the topics need to be at the same title. Number 5 7 08:41, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Parenthetical disambiguation shouldn't be added when it isn't needed; ee WP:CONCISE. Also consistency doesn't require addition of '(Vidhan Sabha constituency)' to the article name since other articles in this category that don't need disambiguation, (correctly) leave that out, e.g., Asansol Dakshin, Asansol Uttar, Katulpur etc.

Note: see also the move request at Talk:Dum Dum Uttar. Manasbose can you list the other similar move requests you might have created so that there can be a consolidated discussion? Abecedare (talk) 19:02, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.