Talk:Raising Mamay

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Raising Mamay article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Outdated

Calling all editors of this article including User:Superastig who have edited the episodes section. Is this article going to be outdated just because User:Kutingko and User:Raisingmamaygma keep adding the same questionable external links? Kutingko and Raisingmamaygma are completely unresponsive in this matter and have resorted to unconstructive edits,just to keep the external links in the article.TheHotwiki (talk) 16:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My recent edit on the episode lists is the updated one. I have no idea as to why those users keep reverting them back to the 52nd episode. I suggest that they should be blocked indefinitely for their disruptive edits and the page should be semi-protected from unconfirmed/IP users. ASTIG️🙃 _{(ICE-T • ICE CUBE)} 10:00, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 17 August 2022 (2)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

This is a last updated of this page name 'Raising Mamay' I'll updated the article to know people this is all details about the show Raisingmamaygma (talk) 14:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:51, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 18 August 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Raisingmamaygma (talk) 03:59, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Blank request. DanCherek (talk) 14:41, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 21 August 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

As one of the users who regularly updated the episode list during the series' existence, I need to restore the page to my recent edit, which has an updated and complete episode list. User:Kutingko and User:Raisingmamaygma keep reverting it several times for no reason and their edits are therefore considered disruptive. ASTIG️🙃 _{(ICE-T • ICE CUBE)} 01:51, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note: any comments from other editors? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:59, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article should be reverted to this version.[1], which restored the final episode of the series. User:Kutingko and User:Raisingmamaygma keep adding the same external links for no valid reason, and didn't help the article at all. I also suggest the administrators to review the edit history of those editors.TheHotwiki (talk) 22:16, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The version Hotwiki indicated is more preferable. As for the 2 users mentioned, they should be blocked (perhaps indefinitely) for disruptive editing. ASTIG️🙃 _{(ICE-T • ICE CUBE)} 00:12, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done I have completed this request, acknowledging that the dispute around whether this version should be on the page was the primary reason why this page was protected (Stwalkster and MSGJ for courtesy). I note the fact the other two editors have not discussed this in the two weeks since the protection was put in place and that they have not contested this edit request in the week it's been in place. Izno (talk) 21:31, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]