Talk:Rainbow Lounge raid

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rainbow Lounge raid article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 October 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 July 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Dallas-Fort Worth (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dallas-Fort WorthWikipedia:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthTemplate:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthDallas-Fort Worth articles

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Please help me to add content and Wikify this page. I think the Rainbow Lounge Raid 2009 will go down in LGBT history.

I added a reference from the New York Times. I also deleted a section that at least one editor considered a coatrack issue, but did so mostly because it was unsourced. Wperdue (talk) 16:53, 4 July 2009 (UTC)wperdue[reply]

Thanks for your help with this article! The New York Times article seems to give a good summary of what has happened so far. There is a new domain that just came out today, but hasn't been uploaded yet www.RainbowLoungeRaid.com Hopefully this will give more central information we can use here. Markg65 (talk) 22:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Changed class to START page. Further events happening in the DFW area may prompt heavier response from the GBLT community. This event is continuing to unfold, and page will need further updates. Wizkid2122 (talk) 19:48, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More Potential References

Markg65 (talk) 04:43, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this article flagged for deletion?

Why is this article flagged for deletion? It meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion.

1) Is the event important or newsworthy?

YES: Multiple major news networks are covering the event, and it touches on strong themes in society such as (unverified) police brutality and (unverified) gay persecution.

2) Does the article site sources?

YES: All major points in the article are sited in the appropriate footnotes.

3) Does the article take a neutral voice?

YES: Though this could be cleaned up a bit, and additional information added, there is no definite bias to the information presented, nor is the tone of the article in first-person, third-person, etc. No "weasel words" are used.

Whoever has marked this article for deletion needs to explain why they have done so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.50.246.246 (talk) 21:39, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Go to the discussion and find out. - ALLST✰R▼^echo _{wuz here} 23:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of news coverage

Anyone else notice that the main news outlets haven't discussed this news story at all? Why isn't that mentioned in the article? --98.232.181.201 (talk) 08:36, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because it would be original research ? and we don't do original research. --Cameron Scott (talk) 09:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rainbow Lounge raid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121025181803/http://www.webcitation.org/5iMe3fHHo to http://www.webcitation.org/5iMe3fHHo

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rainbow Lounge raid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5inay7yPkkTDQNAchI0fOrLZxCdCAD99F9PA00

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:16, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]