Talk:Rainbow Fraternity

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rainbow Fraternity article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Rainbow Fraternity was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (February 6, 2015). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Fraternities and Sororities Mid‑importance

	Rainbow Fraternity is part of the Fraternities and Sororities WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Greek Life on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to International social societies, local organizations, honor societies, and their members. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project page, where you can join the project, and/or contribute to the discussion.Fraternities and SororitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Fraternities and SororitiesTemplate:WikiProject Fraternities and SororitiesFraternities and Sororities
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rainbow Fraternity/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Guerillero (talk · contribs) 04:18, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Failed "good article" nomination

This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 6, 2015, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: ✗ Fail

2. Verifiable?: ✗ Fail

3. Broad in coverage?: ✗ Fail

4. Neutral point of view?: ✓ Pass

5. Stable?: ✓ Pass

6. Images?: ✓ Pass

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Guerillero | My Talk 04:18, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]