Talk:Railway Mania

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Railway Mania article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in UK Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as High-importance).

comparisons

sorry I am quite new at editing-- am a quite a good editor but if I am against convention please help me out.

The section of comparisons, the railway wayleave is not just an an analogy-- BR definitely used their wayleave and communication network to attempt to get into generaly telelphony (as opposed to just telephone systems).

BICC, who I worked for, made some products to attempt to use similar wayleaves which exist on the electricity network (i.e. overtrung cables from pylons) to superimpose fast comms using vibre optic inter- or over- wound with the cable, or by using high frequency AC that would not be affected by the mains frequency.

This is not an attemptd at an extension to the section, I should be pleased to hear your views and I will provide a first draft with more detail if you think worth it SimonTrew (talk) 20:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC)trewy@live.co.uk[reply]

I think the comparison being drawn is not with the physical or local implementation, but the Wild West nature of floating companies that may or may not be substantial, and might or might not make a fortune for "retail" investors.

Any editing work from somone who has in-depth knowledge about a topic is welcome -- this article isn't particularly well written -- and I hope that you will not be deterred from using your expertise to improve articles within your area of knowledge. this particular article is very railway-specific, though, and may not be your home territory. Nevertheless it badly needs some work on it. H G Lewin wrote a book, "The Railway Mania and its Aftermath" which has been reprinted since WW2 and is available second hand, and would be a good starting point. Good luck. Afterbrunel (talk) 16:11, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Railway Mania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130213053526/http://www.voxeu.eu/index.php?q=node/3598 to http://www.voxeu.eu/index.php?q=node%2F3598

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]