Talk:Railroad Retirement Board

Trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	February 2, 2019

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The LIRR pension fund almost certainly lost big in 2008. 66.92.134.109 (talk) 11:58, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008: Wholesale revisions and neutral point of view

First off, doing a wholesale cut-and-paste of a dry government web site does not an encyclopedic entry make. I have to agree that this article as it stands today sucks; it is a true stub-quality article. But to improve it, additions need to be meaningful and have footnotes/references. Just copying a website to here ain't going to cut it. If you disagree with me, please cite the Wiki guideline pages (right here in the talk area) that prove me wrong.

Second, there is no doubt that 30yearrailroadman(contribs|talk), is now the sock puppet of 69.123.97.189 (talk), an IP that is currently banned. I'm glad you figured out how to get around the ban. Now please read some wiki guidelines on how to write a good article. Highspeed (talk) 10:24, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. It seems some poor fellow hopes by censoring Wikipedia to make unpleasant news go away. By the time he learns to do it efficiently, we can hope he will also understand the futility. Meanwhile it would be appropriate to dig up some relevant statistics comparing different retirement funds or railroads or years. Jim.henderson (talk) 04:28, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]