Talk:Railroad Gazette/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 12:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Happy to review. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 12:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Lead:
- I don't think we need citations in the lead unless we are making controversial claims.
- I have copy edited the article to address this matter. North America1000 06:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- It was established and first published in April 1856 I feel it would be better to add this fact to the first line, the period of its run looks significant enough to deserve a mention there.
- Content:
- We should start with the introductory facts as in the lead.
- I have copy edited the article to address this matter. North America1000 06:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- I think we should add something on what this journal used to report in the lead.
- Another publication of the same name Railroad Gazette... I think this should go somewhere in the main text.
- This may actually be best left in the lead. For example, if people go to the article looking for information about the other publication that was established in Rogersville, Tennessee, they will immediately be able to see that this article is about a different topic. North America1000 06:48, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Rest looks good. Just ensure that the article has been expanded as far as possible. Cheers! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 12:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the changes. I feel this article is ready for promotion. Great job! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 07:03, 21 April 2016 (UTC)