Talk:Rail transport in Tasmania

Australia: Tasmania / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Rail transport in Tasmania is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Speedy deletion contested

I contest the speedy deletion of this article because:

The article is to be expanded (and already has been);
The article covers a topic in line with standard Wikipedia naming requirements;
The article will ensure that the topic it covers is better explained. --Lholden 21:35, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing West Coast Join

The Australian Railway Atlas No 1 Tasmania Quail Map Company 2004 ISBN 1 898319693 would be sufficient argument enough to not join west coast with the larger article.

(1) Larger scope article is pathetically underworked in com'parison to the history it could carry - little effort to improve the article has occured
(2) Most texts on the history of the railways 'separate the western railways from the others - few if any attempt to put all the lines together
(3) MAP 8 of the quail atlas was to be the next reference to improve the western article
(4) The information and format of the western tas railways was made specifically for the regional quirks - unless the same is done for all parts of the tasmanian lines

it is creating a bad impression of the lack of work on the mainline and east coast line work to date.

Solution, I would suggest reverting, and giving a reasonable time for improvement of the west coast article - and see if anyone even considers doing a seconds work on the main article - and I would not hold my breath if i were you :| Satu Suro 09:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The mainline stuff is a bit tricky in a way as http://www.railtasmania.com/ exists. It covers Tasmania in pretty good detail already, so I feel this article would be more of a general overview / summary of the Tasmanian scene as a whole, and just a jumping off point to the hard core gunzel detail type stuff. I'm not one to tell people what to do, but I see little point in rewriting what they have already. Wongm (talk) 09:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah well i stick with the west coast as a sep issue - and in time I'll get back to you about the rest - just because something is on a web page doesnt make it necesarily the most authoritative source - I havent had enought time to compare my quail with the web site but will check later - as for gunzel it is obviously a victorian problem - never heard it here or elsewhere till now :) Satu Suro 10:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nah not updated in a year, hardly what I call a regularly update website - I would not consider it sufficiently authoritative (or detailed enoguh) - I still stick by my written offline sources like quail thanks even if does have some gem pdfs:) Satu Suro 10:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok bits and pieces - http://www.railtasmania.com/lines/ - confirmation of the idea to keep the west separate in my perception of things Satu Suro 10:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

I would encourage someone knowledgable to look at editing the start of this document. It sounds very biased against the rail service. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.208.247.159 (talk) 09:30, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rail transport in Tasmania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060918134417/http://www.ministers.dotars.gov.au/wtr/releases/2005/December/071WT_2005.htm to http://www.ministers.dotars.gov.au/wtr/releases/2005/December/071WT_2005.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:38, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Rail transport in Tasmania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bell Bay Branch.

Bell Bay Line - ... It is the proposal that this line be converted to standard gauge to facilitate the transfer of mainland railway wagons direct to Bell Bay and Launceston, however no further action has been forcoming to date. This surely is not true. I do know there was a proposal to reopen the line to Smithton to meet the SG line of the Bass Straight Tunnel. Flats would be bogie lifted at Smithton and continue on The Gauge to Apollo Bay, Beech Forest and Colac (via King Is). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.183.53.2 (talk) 12:17, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]