Talk:Raid on Grand Pré/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk • message • contribs • count • logs • email) 13:06, 30 August 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- Why are the endnotes after the Bibliography?
- Laziness :). Fixed now. Magic♪piano 13:06, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
- Why are the endnotes after the Bibliography?
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Is there a link for the frigate Adventure? And who does she belong to?
- Good catch. Strangely, most sources don't list all three of HM ships at once -- the Gosport and Jersey are usually mentioned together, the Adventure hardly. Fixed now. Magic♪piano 13:06, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
- Is there a link for the frigate Adventure? And who does she belong to?
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Thanks again for reviewing. Magic♪piano 13:06, 30 August 2011 (UTC)