Jump to content

Talk:Raid on Grand Pré/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk message contribs count logs email) 13:06, 30 August 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Why are the endnotes after the Bibliography?
    Laziness :). Fixed now. Magic♪piano 13:06, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Is there a link for the frigate Adventure? And who does she belong to?
    Good catch. Strangely, most sources don't list all three of HM ships at once -- the Gosport and Jersey are usually mentioned together, the Adventure hardly. Fixed now. Magic♪piano 13:06, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Thanks again for reviewing. Magic♪piano 13:06, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]