Talk:Raheem J. Brennerman

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has serious PoV issues

Seems to be written in the light most favorable to the subject, especially the section on his trial and conviction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.2.16.112 (talk) 16:11, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cite link to Sunday Times is paywall, alternate source available

In case my newly-added citation link to The Sunday Times' article about Brennerman's criminal conviction is unsuitable due to being paywalled, a full-text copy of that article is also available at http://www.duncancampbell.org/PDF/fraudster-brennerman-convicted.pdf - but I felt it more-proper to link to the official authoritative publisher in the first instance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MattFBTR (talk • contribs) 22:24, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adjustments to remove bias

I will work on making adjustments to remove bias and make this page as factual and neutral as possible.

PrimeGoat (talk) 01:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@PrimeGoat: "Free Raheem Brennerman" is clearly a partisan campaign site (launched, as the article says, by the subject himself). Do you have an affiliation with that site, or the subject? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:41, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]