Jump to content

Talk:Raghunath Temple/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Royroydeb (talk · contribs) 17:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • The lead is not only short but also very mediocre.
    • Expanded
  • In the location section, please mention Jammu and Kashmir state as well as link Jammu city.
    • Done
  • Isn't it "Architecture" and not "Features"?
    • In most temple articles “Features” is the title generally used as it deals with other details of the temple, in addition to the type of architecture.
  • I think the Religious School section should be included in the history, because it is a part of the history of the temple. You can keep it separate by keeping it in the 3rd heading. Just a suggestion, I would like to hear your comments about this.
    • A separate section would be in order. As you have mentioned it, I have now shifted it to the History section with a 3rd heading.
  • Please link Ranjit Singh, and mention him as the founder of the Sarbat Khalsa or the Sikh empire.
    • There is spelling error here. I have changed it to Ranbir Singh. Ranjit Singh was not involved with this temple.
  • Was the translation centre during Ranjit Singh's rule?
    • It was during Ranbir Singh’s time and not Ranjit Singh. I have corrected the spelling mistake
  • Which Maharaja?
    • Yes, Maharaja Ranbir Singh. Name mentioned now.
  • Can you expand the terrorist attacks? I mean who did it.
    • I kept the text here to the minimum as the attacks were incidental. Fidayeen (suicide bombers) is already mentioned in the article that it was by Fidayeen (suicide bombers). However, I have now added Laskar-e-Toiba.

RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 17:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Nvvchar:, the last thing which needs to be done is to mention who is Ranbir Singh, I mean of which dynasty he belongs. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 08:27, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]