Jump to content

Talk:Rage (T'Pau album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Ragealbum.jpg

[edit]

Image:Ragealbum.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:27, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

unreferenced article

[edit]

Article needs to have reliable sources per WP:RS, WP:V and WP:CITE. Sincerely, –Mattisse (Talk) 13:12, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Conflict of Interest

[edit]

A number of additions to this page have been written by Tim Burgess (me) a member of T'Pau. There are two potential problems with this: 1. As many of these are from first-hand, personal knowledge there is a lack of references for some of this information. 2. There is the potential for a conflict of interest in any Wkipedia contributor writing about subjects that are too close to the author.

In all cases, I have endeavoured to write in a neutral manner and tried make sure there is no "editorial" comment of either a positive or negative slant.

However, it seems right to ask whether others object to my content and would prefer that I either edited it or removed it. Just for clarity, my intention of putting some of these details in is that I think fans (who are the most likely visitors to this entry) are likely to enjoy them and that they are uncontentious.

Feel free to disagree! Umbradog (talk) 19:54, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rage (T'Pau album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]