Talk:Rag pudding
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Poorly written
[edit]this is a terribly written article. 178.73.221.18 (talk) 00:18, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
the request for cleanup was made by me (random wiki lurker) hoping a galant editor will swoop in. As it stands now this is a horribly bad article. 90.237.179.18 (talk) 16:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- I improved it somewhat:
- 1) Fixed frequent improper use of mixed case.
- 2) Moved pic to right side.
- 3) Added sections.
- 4) Fixed odd usages of quotation marks.
- 5) Added link.
- 6) Removed redundant text.
- I also removed the cleanup tag. Is there anything else that needs clean up here ? StuRat (talk) 22:39, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- But how is it notable? Why does it deserve an article on Wikipedia? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Move/Rename needed
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Rag Pudding → ? –
- There's no reason why this article name should be in mixed caps. I'd move it myself, but there's a redirect page (to here) there. StuRat (talk) 22:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- Support per WP:TITLEFORMAT I agree
and have put a {{db-move}} tag on Rag pudding(declined). -- Trevj (talk) 11:08, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.