Jump to content

Talk:List of Flash enemies

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Rag Doll (comics))

Untitled

[edit]

I'd suggest adding Rainbow Rider, Shadow Thief and Kobal Blue, possible Mr Element for all of them are fairly recurring.


Merge with Rogues

[edit]

This page should be merged with Rogues (comics), because 1. Both pages are about the same thing 2. The Flashes enemies are called the Rogues and 3. the Rogues page is a much better article. 76.189.115.109 00:18, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've never recalled the golden age adversaries of the Flash being termed "The Rogues"...and the silver age villains were in the "Rogues Gallery". The Rogues is a subset of List of Flash enemies not the other way around.Netkinetic (t/c/@) 05:26, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I've always got... up until the Blacksmith arc. It was the mid range foes for Barry Allen, no Grodd, Kadabra, or Prof Zoom, and no one-shot/minor villains. Johns changed that a bit, with THE Rogues being a core group among a larger community, as case of "There are Rogues and then there are The Rogues" if you will.
Right now, I'd argue that Rogues (comics) should be tightened to that core group, Barry's group and the nucleus of Johns' group for the Blacksmith arc. And that this list be kept for everything, what links to Rogues (comics) and what falls outside of that. - J Greb 06:14, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's done. I'm going to take down the sign now because I have done major revisions and also because an other user and I have agreed on what this page and the rogues page should be about. Rhino131 23:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

rewrite

[edit]

I personally think I am going to bring this list back as what it was without being a plot section article and back into a link article. Any character still minor can merge into the the DC Comics characters article. Some I might put back as articles. I am thinking maybe some that have appeared in the Arrowverse can have there own articles back. Any objections? Jhenderson 777 00:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]